����ֱ��

A Subordination Agreement establishes the priority order between different creditors' claims on the same assets. In Austrian banking and finance, these agreements help lenders manage their risks when multiple parties have claims against the same borrower or property. The junior creditor agrees to place their claim behind the senior creditor's rights.

Under Austrian law (particularly relevant to secured lending and insolvency proceedings), these agreements play a vital role in structuring complex financing deals. They're commonly used in real estate transactions, corporate refinancing, and project finance where multiple lenders need clear rules about who gets paid first. Banks and financial institutions often require subordination as a condition for extending new credit.

Use a Subordination Agreement when your business needs additional financing but already has existing loans. Austrian banks typically require these agreements before extending new credit to companies with outstanding debt. They're especially crucial when seeking emergency funding or expansion capital, as they clearly establish which lender gets paid first.

These agreements become essential during property refinancing, corporate restructuring, or when taking on strategic investors. For example, if you're a real estate developer seeking construction financing with existing mortgage debt, or a growing business needing working capital while managing multiple credit lines, a Subordination Agreement helps structure these complex financial relationships legally and transparently.

• General Debt Subordination: Used in standard corporate lending, these agreements rank multiple lenders' claims against a borrower's assets and establish payment priorities.
• Intercompany Subordination: Common in Austrian corporate groups, these agreements subordinate claims between affiliated companies to external creditors.
• Project Finance Subordination: Specifically structured for large infrastructure or real estate projects, organizing multiple tiers of debt and investment.
• Mezzanine Financing Subordination: Addresses the unique position of mezzanine lenders between senior debt and equity in Austrian financing structures.

• Senior Lenders: Usually banks or financial institutions who require Subordination Agreements to protect their first-priority position when extending new loans.
• Junior Creditors: Including mezzanine lenders, equipment financiers, or private investors who agree to take a secondary position in payment priority.
• Corporate Borrowers: Companies seeking additional financing while managing existing debt obligations.
• Legal Counsel: Austrian lawyers who draft and review these agreements to ensure compliance with local banking regulations and insolvency laws.
• Corporate Officers: Directors and financial officers who negotiate and execute these agreements on behalf of their organizations.

• Debt Details: Collect full information about existing loans, including amounts, dates, and current creditors' details.
• Priority Structure: Define the exact payment ranking and rights between senior and junior creditors.
• Asset Documentation: Gather details of all collateral and security interests involved in the existing and new loans.
• Financial Statements: Prepare current financial records to demonstrate the borrower's debt capacity.
• Regulatory Compliance: Verify alignment with Austrian banking regulations and insolvency laws.
• Signatory Authority: Confirm proper authorization levels for all parties involved in the agreement.

• Party Identification: Full legal names and details of all creditors, debtors, and guarantors involved.
• Debt Description: Precise details of all relevant debts, including amounts, dates, and terms.
• Priority Structure: Clear ranking of payment and security rights between creditors.
• Trigger Events: Specific circumstances that activate subordination rights.
• Payment Terms: Rules governing permitted payments to junior creditors.
• Enforcement Rights: Detailed procedures for exercising creditor rights under Austrian law.
• Governing Law: Explicit reference to Austrian law and jurisdiction.
• Termination Conditions: Clear criteria for when the agreement ends or can be modified.

A Subordination Agreement differs significantly from a Debt Settlement Agreement, though both deal with debt management. While Subordination Agreements establish priority rankings between multiple creditors, Debt Settlement Agreements focus on resolving existing debt obligations between a single creditor and debtor.

• Purpose: Subordination Agreements organize payment hierarchies among multiple lenders, while Debt Settlement Agreements modify or resolve a single debt obligation.
• Timing: Subordination Agreements are typically executed before new financing, while Debt Settlement Agreements address existing troubled debt.
• Parties Involved: Subordination requires multiple creditors to establish rankings; Debt Settlement involves just one creditor and debtor.
• Legal Effect: Subordination changes payment priorities under Austrian insolvency law; Debt Settlement modifies or terminates specific debt obligations.