����ֱ��

A Trade mark co-existence agreement lets two companies legally use similar brand names or logos without suing each other. When Belgian businesses discover they share comparable trademarks, they can sign this agreement to outline how each will use their mark while avoiding customer confusion.

The agreement typically sets clear boundaries about where and how each company can use their trademark - for example, in different market sectors, regions, or product categories. It's particularly useful in Belgium's multilingual market, where similar names might naturally arise across Dutch, French, and German-speaking regions. These agreements help prevent costly legal disputes while protecting both parties' brand rights under Belgian and EU trademark law.

Consider a Trade mark co-existence agreement when you discover another Belgian company using a trademark similar to yours, but you'd prefer to avoid costly litigation. This often happens when expanding into new markets or after mergers and acquisitions reveal overlapping brand rights.

The agreement becomes essential when both companies can legitimately claim rights to similar marks, yet operate in different enough spaces to coexist peacefully. For example, a French-speaking Walloon company making industrial equipment might share a name with a Dutch-speaking Flemish fashion brand. Acting early to draft this agreement prevents future disputes and protects both parties' market positions under Belgian trademark law.

• Geographic agreements: Limit each party's trademark use to specific Belgian regions or language communities - common between Flemish and Walloon businesses
• Product-specific agreements: Allow similar marks for different product categories or industries, with clear boundaries on market segments
• Visual distinction agreements: Detail specific design elements each party must use to differentiate their marks
• Time-based agreements: Phase out one party's use over time or restrict usage to certain seasons
• Language-specific agreements: Permit similar marks across different Belgian language versions or translations

• Brand Owners: Companies or individuals who hold trademark rights and need to protect their marks while allowing limited shared use
• IP Lawyers: Belgian intellectual property attorneys who draft and negotiate the co-existence terms, ensuring compliance with EU and local trademark laws
• Marketing Directors: Key stakeholders who help define acceptable brand usage parameters and market boundaries
• BOIP Officials: Benelux Office for Intellectual Property staff who may review these agreements during trademark registration processes
• Corporate Legal Teams: In-house counsel who manage ongoing compliance and resolve any disputes under the agreement

• Trademark Details: Gather registration certificates, usage history, and geographic scope of both marks in Belgium and the Benelux region
• Market Analysis: Document each party's product lines, target customers, and distribution channels to define clear boundaries
• Visual Elements: Compile logos, designs, and brand guidelines to specify permitted uses and required distinctions
• Territory Mapping: Define specific regions, language communities, or market segments where each mark can operate
• Future Plans: Include anticipated business expansions or brand developments to prevent future conflicts
• Compliance Check: Review BOIP requirements and EU trademark regulations to ensure agreement enforceability

• Party Identification: Full legal names, registered addresses, and trademark registration details of both entities
• Scope Definition: Precise description of each trademark, including visual elements and permitted usage contexts
• Territorial Limits: Clear boundaries for Belgian regions, language communities, or international markets where marks can be used
• Usage Parameters: Specific rules about brand presentation, prohibited activities, and required distinctions
• Dispute Re����ֱ��: Belgian court jurisdiction and applicable Benelux trademark laws
• Term and Termination: Duration, renewal conditions, and circumstances for agreement cancellation
• Signatures: Authorized representative details and formal execution requirements under Belgian law

A Trade mark co-existence agreement differs significantly from a Trademark License Agreement in both purpose and scope. While both deal with trademark rights in Belgium, they serve distinct business needs.

• Purpose and Control: Co-existence agreements establish boundaries between two independent trademark owners, while license agreements grant specific usage rights from one owner to another party
• Financial Arrangements: License agreements typically involve royalty payments or fees, whereas co-existence agreements rarely include financial terms
• Duration and Termination: License agreements often have fixed terms with renewal options, while co-existence agreements usually remain permanent unless breached
• Market Approach: Co-existence focuses on preventing confusion and conflict in shared markets, while licensing aims to monetize trademark rights through controlled usage
• Regulatory Context: Under Belgian law, co-existence agreements require BOIP notification, while license agreements need formal registration for enforcement